Saturday, July 02, 2011

Readers of the Pack


Bookforum discusses the history of the American bestseller's list.

From the article...

Trends come and go, but the best seller remains essentially serendipitous. An editor can be no more certain of finding the next one than a writer can be assured of writing it. "As a rule of thumb," writes John Sutherland, an English scholar who has studied the phenomenon, "what defines the bestseller is bestselling. Nothing else."

The term best seller has always been a misnomer. Fast seller would be more appropriate, since the pace of sales matters as much as the quantity. The first list of books "in order of demand" was created in 1895 by Harry Thurston Peck, editor of the trade magazine The Bookman. Publishers Weekly started its own list in 1912, but others were slow to follow: The New York Times did not create its best-seller list until 1942. Now, the Wall Street Journal and USA Today also compile national lists, and each of the major regional papers has its own—all generated in slightly different ways. The Times bases its list on sales reports from around four thousand booksellers, which it declines to name (a column by the paper's public editor a few years ago said only that they change constantly). The Wall Street Journal used to track only sales in major chain stores but now bases its rankings on data from Nielsen BookScan, an authoritative industry source that includes as many as three-quarters of the nation's bookstores, around eleven thousand. IndieBound surveys only independent bookstores. Amazon.com offers its own list, updated every hour, but—like all the others—it is based on orders, not actual sales (since returns are not taken into account). Thus a writer with a carefully timed marketing blitz can push his book to a relatively high Amazon ranking for a day or so, allowing him to claim that it was, say, a "top ten Amazon best seller." The system's vulnerability to manipulation has resulted in the perception that, as Eliza Truitt wrote in Slate, the term best seller on the cover of a book means "about as much as the phrase 'original recipe' does on a jar of spaghetti sauce."

3 comments:

Unknown said...

I hve been looking for this kind of article.Really find intresting and insightful.Its been a long time to excel while reading the same calibre of articles and find quite impressive..I loved this article for the beauty of the writing..
Accredited High School Diploma Online

Upholstery Cleaning losfeliz said...

The second we've stop to take in here a little over a working week ago, my brother appeared to be so insistent around crafting feedback on Brian's idea actually being put up. I even so was adamant that we need to keep our lips shut for some time and simply never make a comment however when he tried to make another comment that provides criticsms about precisely how other people reacted on his assertion, I guess he was dead improper for it.

water damage culvercity said...

The public search for anything which may well definitely excite them all and help make any of them come again for much more interactions. That could make your prior comments so frank. It is more beneficial to perform that way rather than take chance on just what is improbable.