The New York Times discusses the slowness of novel writing in this new digital world of fast short writing.
From the piece...
But I am a novelist, so I also know about slowness. Novels, in my
experience, are slow in coming, and once I’ve begun them I know I have
years rather than months of work ahead of me. This doesn’t worry me. I
like the slow pace of novel writing, the feeling that I have employment
for a long period. I don’t crave the quick result that would only leave
me with the problem of what to do next.
All novelists must form their personal pacts in some way with the
slowness of their craft. There are some who demand of themselves a “rate
of production,” for whom it’s a matter of pride to complete, say, a
book every year. But I think most novelists, after writing their first
two or three, take philosophical stock of the fact that in an average
lifetime they will produce a finite and not so large number of novels
and that the point of being a novelist is not to see how many you can
write or how quickly you can do it. Quite a few novelists, I suspect,
even carry in their heads the notion of the one, all-sufficient and
perfect novel they might write, which would render all further effort
redundant. It’s only because this ideal and singular novel is
unattainable that they have to keep writing another, then another.
No comments:
Post a Comment